The Montauk Monster 2.0 by Mike Krumboltz
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
The Montauk Monster 2.0 by Mike Krumboltz
Just when you thought it was safe to take a romantic walk along the beach, another Montauk Monster washes up on the shores of Long Island.
Another, you say? Yes: Last year, the original Monster caused a huge stir across the Web. Nobody knew what it was, but reports indicated it was big, bloated, beaked, and rather gross-looking. Naturally, onlookers couldn't turn away then, and they can't turn away now. (If you're feeling brave and you haven't eaten in a while, check out the story and images from Newsday.)
After Fox News and several other publications reported the latest Monster discovery, queries on the corpulent carcass roared like an angry wildebeest. Within 24 hours, searches on "what is the montauk monster" (a very good question) and "montauk monster pictures" were both red-hot.
Additionally, blogs are now chiming in with their theories on the creature's origin. Was it planted by pranksters? For what it's worth, the urban legend experts at Snopes.com write that there seems to be "no consensus" as to whether the original Monster was real, photoshopped, or just a very large raccoon.
Want to decide for yourself? Beware — even for the Internet, these guys are pretty gross.
Another, you say? Yes: Last year, the original Monster caused a huge stir across the Web. Nobody knew what it was, but reports indicated it was big, bloated, beaked, and rather gross-looking. Naturally, onlookers couldn't turn away then, and they can't turn away now. (If you're feeling brave and you haven't eaten in a while, check out the story and images from Newsday.)
After Fox News and several other publications reported the latest Monster discovery, queries on the corpulent carcass roared like an angry wildebeest. Within 24 hours, searches on "what is the montauk monster" (a very good question) and "montauk monster pictures" were both red-hot.
Additionally, blogs are now chiming in with their theories on the creature's origin. Was it planted by pranksters? For what it's worth, the urban legend experts at Snopes.com write that there seems to be "no consensus" as to whether the original Monster was real, photoshopped, or just a very large raccoon.
Want to decide for yourself? Beware — even for the Internet, these guys are pretty gross.
Re: The Montauk Monster 2.0 by Mike Krumboltz
Not sure what it is, but to me the 'beak' just appears to be the front part of it's skull.
Terminus- Officer
- Number of posts : 583
Age : 32
Location : Somewhere at the boundary of the universe, plotting it's destruction.
Reputation : 0
Registration date : 2008-12-18
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:12 am by Quantum Rain
» My Ships and Renderings
Fri Nov 10, 2017 4:12 am by ToaKaita47
» Corrupt-A-Wish
Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:59 am by ToaKaita47
» Earth-Link Origins - Teaser Trailer
Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:52 am by ToaKaita47
» Rufetic Federation Armed Forces
Fri May 26, 2017 4:57 am by Comrade Greiv
» Virisian Arsenal & Armed Forces
Thu May 25, 2017 10:56 am by Quantum Rain
» The data is back
Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:10 pm by SSJ Data
» King of the Hill
Sat Jan 02, 2016 3:27 pm by SSJ Data
» PlayByPost DnD
Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:21 am by Angusm3
» War and Peace: Remaking a Nation
Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:03 am by Comrade Greiv